MICKAI
Mickai Ebook · 22 pages · 14 May 2026

Post-Quantum Audit for Critical National Infrastructure

An operator-side playbook for the NCSC migration roadmap, the 2031 high-priority infrastructure deadline, and the 2035 universal cryptographically-relevant deadline.

By , Founder and named inventor, Mickai LTD · Crunchbase · LinkedIn · GitHub
Download PDF  →Free · English · PDF
Inside this ebook

The PQC migration ebook. The NCSC roadmap reframed as an operator playbook with the substrate as the engineering counterpart.

Part I: The Deadlines
1. 2031 for high-priority infrastructure
2. 2035 universal
3. What the NCSC actually requires at hour zero
Part II: The Operator-side Migration
4. Inventory the cryptographically-relevant systems
5. ML-KEM (FIPS 203) and ML-DSA (FIPS 204) explained
6. Hash-linking under SHA-3 family
Part III: The Audit-Chain Side
7. Post-quantum signed audit for AI workloads
8. ML-DSA-87 migration path from ML-DSA-65
9. Key custody, rotation, revocation
Part IV: Engagement
10. NCSC, ICO, OFCOM, OFGEM, OFWAT engagement
11. Procurement clauses for PQC readiness
12. The transferable artefact
Frequently asked questions

What are the NCSC post-quantum migration deadlines for UK critical national infrastructure?

The NCSC roadmap sets 2031 for cryptographic migration of high-priority critical national infrastructure (transmission, distribution, water, telecoms backbones, central banking systems) and 2035 for universal migration of all cryptographically-relevant systems in the UK. The roadmap is operator-led: each CNI operator owns its own inventory, sequencing, and evidence chain.

What is the difference between ML-KEM and ML-DSA?

ML-KEM (FIPS 203, finalised 2024) is the post-quantum key encapsulation mechanism, used to replace classical key exchange (Diffie-Hellman, RSA-KEM). ML-DSA (FIPS 204, finalised 2024) is the post-quantum digital signature algorithm, used to replace classical signatures (ECDSA, RSA-PSS). Together they cover the cryptographic primitive replacements a CNI operator needs across confidentiality and integrity surfaces.

How does an operator inventory cryptographically-relevant systems?

The first migration step is inventorying every system that uses TLS, code signing, document signing, VPN tunnels, IoT firmware signing, AI audit trails, or any other cryptographic primitive. The NCSC publishes guidance; the operator-side discipline is to enumerate by system, by primitive in use, by key custody, and by upgrade complexity, then sequence the migration against the 2031 and 2035 deadlines.

Why is the AI audit chain a priority surface for PQC migration?

AI audit chains are typically signed using classical primitives (ECDSA, RSA-PSS) by AI vendors who do not control their own PQC roadmap. A regulator in 2031 walking a four-year-old audit trail signed with ECDSA would face a chain that is no longer cryptographically-relevant under NCSC guidance. The operator that lands AI audit signing on ML-DSA-65 today is ahead of the deadline structurally.

What does the Mickai substrate do that a vendor PQC story does not?

The Mickai substrate gives the operator post-quantum-signed audit records under the operator's own key. No vendor PQC migration plan, however well-intentioned, transfers cryptographic custody to the buyer. Trust-domain externalisation as a primitive does. The operator's PQC posture becomes independent of the AI vendor's PQC roadmap.

Suggested citation
Irons, M. (2026). Post-Quantum Audit for Critical National Infrastructure: An operator-side playbook for the NCSC migration roadmap, the 2031 high-priority infrastructure deadline, and the 2035 universal cryptographically-relevant deadline. Mickai LTD. https://mickai.co.uk/ebooks/post-quantum-audit-for-critical-national-infrastructure
About the author

Micky Irons

Founder of Mickai LTD (Companies House 17166618, England and Wales). Named inventor on the Mickai SIOS patent corpus, recorded on the UK Intellectual Property Office public register at numbers GB2607309.8 to GB2610422.4. Trade mark Mickai registered at UK00004373277 (classes 9 and 42, filed 15 April 2026). Before founding Mickai, Micky was a Sellafield site worker, and the egress constraint observed from inside the regulated workstation is the engineering origin of the substrate.